← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26034/2026dismissed

Ajay Kumar Sethy @ Ajaya Kr. Sethi @ Pinku v. Union Of India Through N.C.B. Patna

2026-04-20Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26034 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2023 Thana- N.C.B (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Sethy @ Ajaya Kr. Sethi @ Pinku S/O Uttam Sethy Resident of Village- Tahsil Colony ( Regha Khol), P.S- Regha Khol, Distt.- Sambhalpur ( Urisa).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Union of India through N.C.B. Patna Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr Krishna Nandan Singh (Asg) For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-04-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with NCB P.S. Case No. 14 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 8©, 20(b), (ii)©, 25, 29 of NDPS Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the recovery is of 544 Kg of Ganja.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 4.11.2023 and in the trial, out of 9 witnesses, four witnesses have already been examined in the trial.

5. Considering the quantum of recovery and the fact that the trial is progressing, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26034 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 2/2

6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

7. The prosecution is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner failing which the concerned I.O. will appear in this Court.

8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U