Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25738/2023bail granted

Vikas Yadav @ Vikas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-18Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25738 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2023 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== VIKAS YADAV @ VIKAS KUMAR Son of Shreeram Rai R/VParmanandpur, PS- Dumra, Dist-Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 18.01.2023 in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 08 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 17.01.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. Recovery is of one country made pistol, one live cartridge and one mobile phone from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that one country made pistol, one live

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25738 of 2023(3) dt.18-07-2023 2/3 cartridge and one mobile phone have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that there is noncompliance with mandatory procedure prescribed for recovery under Section 100 of Cr.P.C. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 18.01.2023.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries three criminal antecedent other than the present one.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Shri Awanindra Prakash, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 08 of 2023, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25738 of 2023(3) dt.18-07-2023 3/3 consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T