Patna High CourtL.P.A/1202/2012dismissed

Bhupendra Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-13Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1202 of 2012 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4455 of 2007 ======================================================

1. Bhupendra Kumar Sharma S/O Late Radha Krishna Singh Resident Of Village Khokhara, Police Station Kalyanpur, District East Champaran At Motihari, Assistant Teacher Sitaram High School, Lal Saraiya Colony, Police Station Bettiah, District West Champaran At Bettiah. .... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, (Vikas Bhawan) Patna.

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, (Vikas Bhawan), Patna.

4. The Deputy Director, Government Of Bihar, Bihar Secondary Education Office, Budhmarg, Patna- 800001.

5. The Regional Deputy Director Of Education, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

6. The District Education Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Jainendra Kumar Sinha, AC to GA 6. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) 13-02-2015 Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter, inasmuch as, the learned Single Judge has clearly noted that the writ petitioner failed to respond the allegations in the counter affidavit that his name did not appear in the empanelment of candidates list for appointment and if that be so, how the

Patna High Court LPA No.1202 of 2012 (3) dt.13-02-2015 2/2 appointment letter was issued, is itself doubtful. The writ petitioner not having responded the stand of the State, the learned Single Judge rightly dismissed the writ petition. We are not inclined to entertain the appeal and it is accordingly dismissed.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U