Gayatri Devi And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37549 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nawada ======================================================
1. Gayatri Devi, wife of Murari Tiwari, resident of Mohalla- Kalyanpur Gutu Sai, P.O.-Sadar, P.S.-Muffasil, District-West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, Jharkhand
2. Murari Tiwari, son of Late Talkeshwar Tiwari, resident of MohallaKalyanpur Gutu Sai, P.O.-Sadar, P.S.-Muffasil, District-West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, Jharkhand
3. Pinki Devi, wife of Rajendra Dubey, resident of Village-Birsa Nagar, Zone No. 3, Sector-1, Block-A, Telco Link Road, P.O. and P.S.-Telco, DistrictJamshedpur, West Singhbhum ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Prem Lata Devi @ Nibha, daughter of Rajendra Pathak, wife of Manish Tiwari, resident of Mohalla-Ambedkar Nagar, P.O. and P.S.-Nawadah, District-Nawadah.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2019 The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 22.12.2016 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 24 of 2016 whereby cognizance has been taken against the petitioners under Sections 498(A), 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The learned advocate for the petitioners has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37549 of 2017(2) dt.23-07-2019 2/2 fairly stated that after framing of the charges in this case, witnesses are being examined.
This Court, under the aforesaid circumstances is not inclined to interfere with the order of cognizance. However, if the petitioners, within the midst of trial feel that there could be a settlement with O.P. No. 2, they may explore such possibility and bring it to the notice of the Trial Court.
The petition is dismissed with the aforesaid observation.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- U T