Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33069/2016bail granted

Vijay Kumar Rao v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33069 of 2016 (2) dt.20-08-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33069 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2016 Thana -BAIRIYA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Rao son of Ramjee Prasad Rao, resident of VillageLaukariya, P.S. Bairia, District- West Champaran at Bettia. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohan Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 09.06.2016 in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No. 120 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 406, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the E.C. Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated out of village political rivalry. The recovery according to the seizure list has been made from Yadav Lal Sah, Jokhu Sah and not from the petitioner, who claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33069 of 2016 (2) dt.20-08-2016 of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No. 120 of 2016 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T