Mohan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17770 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Mohan Singh, son of late Dhanraj Singh, resident 0f Village-Bela Singer Moti ,P.S +Block Nirmali, District Supaul.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate, Supual.
4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nirmali District Supaul.
5. The Block Development Officer Nirmali, District Supaul.
6. The Circle Officer, Anchal-Nirmali, District Supaul. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jai Shankar Barnawal, GA-5 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH JUDGMENT AND ORDER ORAL (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 04-02-2016 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Jai Shankar Barnwal, learned GA-5, appearing for the Staterespondents. The grievance of the writ petitioner, made in this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, relates to encroachment of public path/public road.
Having regard to the facts pleaded in this writ petition, the
Patna High Court CWJC No.17770 of 2015 dt.04-02-2016 2/2 materials on record and, having heard learned counsel for both the parties, we find that the subject matter of this writ petition is fully covered by the observations made, and the directions given by us in the case of Sanjay Jha Vs. The State of Bihar and Others, reported in 2016 (1) PLJR 248.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that respondent No.3, namely, District Magistrate, Supaul, and respondent No.4, namely, Sub-Divisional Officer, Nirmali, District Supaul, shall act, in the present matter, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made and the directions given in the order, dated 24.11.2015, aforementioned. In view of the above, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(I. A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U