Bullet Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41829 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2016 Thana -MAJHAHGARH District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================
1. Bullet Sah, Son of Bhuwal Sah @ Sri Ram Sah,
2. Kalawati Devi W/o Achchelal Sah, Both R/o Village- Parsurampur, P.S.- Mnanjhagarh, District- Gopalganj.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 91 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section-3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It has been submitted that petitioners are Gotani and Devar of the deceased.
From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. As per written report, the sister of the informant died due to burn injuries in her Sasural. These petitioners were living separate from husband of the deceased. They have no concern with the affairs of husband of the deceased. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41829 of 2017 (2) dt.11-09-2017 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 91 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T