← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11097/2021withdrawn

Gulab Kishore Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-25Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad,Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11097 of 2021 ====================================================== Gulab Kishore Mandal Son of Late Malik Mandal, Resident of Village-Sarua, Grampanchayat-Damodra, P.S. and Block-Katoria, District-banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar.

2.

The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Banka. 3.

The District Officer-Cum-Chairman, District-Selection Committee, Banka. 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer Bank 5.

The District Supply Officer, Banka.

6.

The Block Development officer Katoria, Banka. 7.

The Block Supply Officer, Kotoria, Banka 8.

Pawan Kumar Son of Suman Kumar Saurabh, Resident of Village-Bhelwa, Panchyat Bharsar Bhelwa, P.S. Karotia, District-Banka. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 25-03-2022 This application has been taken up for online hearing through video conference because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Mr. N.K. Agarwal, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after some argument, seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with a liberty to the

Patna High Court CWJC No.11097 of 2021(4) dt.25-03-2022 2/2 petitioner to invoke appropriate remedy under the provisions of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 ('Control Order, 2016' for short).

This application stands disposed of accordingly with the liberty as aforesaid.

We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the present case. It will be open for the appropriate statutory authority under the Control Order, 2016 to take its decision without being prejudiced by the present order. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) K.K.RAO/- U