Sudhir Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38991 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -951 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar, aged about 37 years, Son of Chandrika Prasad, R/o Biju Bigha, PO Biju Bigha, PS-Sirdala, District- Nawada, at present working as Office Superintendent, Mandan Bharti Agrculture College Regional Research Center, Aguanpur, PO+District- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State of Bihar

2. Anjana Kumari, aged about 30 years, W/o Anjan Kumar, D/0 Late Jai Prakash Narayan, R/0 Mukteshwar Colony, Mohalla Mayaganj, PO Mayaganj P.S. Barari, District-Bhagalpur .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Complaint Case N0. 951 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 323,498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Petitioner is the husband of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant with full honour, love and dignity.

It is evident from the materials on record that matrimonial discord between them is the root cause for registration of the First Information Report. No purpose will be served, if the petitioner is taken into custody.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38991 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 It is submitted that the petitioner shall present himself before the police as and when required and there is no chance that he will tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses.

Considering the nature of accusation and submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, this application is allowed.

Let the petitioner above named in the event of his arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in Complaint Case No. 951 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U