Patna High CourtMJC/1374/2014disposed

M/S R.S. Pandey And Co. Through Its Managing Director, Muzaffarpur v. Mr. Khalid Bin Jamal And ORS.

2017-08-22Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1374 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8160 of 2011 ====================================================== M/S. R.S. Pandey & Co. through its Managing Director Dinesh Pandey, Resident of Village - Manjhaulia Road, P.S. Koshi Mohammadpur, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Mr. Khalid Bin Jamal, at present posted as Principal Secretary, Central Public Works Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi

2. Mr. S.K.S. Devan, at present posted as the Chief Engineer, Central Public Works Department, Pant Bhawan, Patna

3. Mr. P.L. Gupta, at present posted as the Project Manager, PMGSY Project Circle, Central Public Works Department, Pant Bhawan, Patna

4. Mr. R.P. Singh, at present posted as the PMGSY Project Division, Muzaffarpur, at PCD II, CPWD, Patna

5. Mr. R.R. Dehiya, at present posted as the Executive Engineer, PMGSY Project Division, Central Public Works Department, Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siya Ram Shahi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan (A.S.G.) Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh (CGC) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In view of the statement made by the opposite parties that the case of the petitioner was referred to the Standing Empowered Committee and the decisions on the petitioner's case was taken vide letter no.

12(3)/CE (EZII)/PMGSY/CPWD/2014/366 dated 26.05.2014 which was duly communicated to the petitioner, this Court does not deem it fit to proceed further in the contempt matter.

Patna High Court MJC No.1374 of 2014 (8) dt.22-08-2017 2/2 Accordingly, the contempt application stands disposed of.

However, petitioner shall be at liberty to assail the said order before the appropriate authority, if so advised. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U