Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30470/2024dismissed

Devnandan Yadav @ Prince Kumar @ Devan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-17Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30470 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-576 Year-2022 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Devnandan Yadav @ Prince Kumar @ Devan Son of Upendra Yadav @ Surendra Yadav R/o Village- Rampur, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya At present R/o Ambatari, P.S.- Chauparan, District- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-05-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 576 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016.

3. As per allegation, 310 liters of liquor was recovered from the pick up van of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier he was granted bail by this court, but at the time of grant of bail, it was observed that if the petitioner is found involved in any other case, his bail bond shall not be accepted. He has further submitted that when the petitioner furnished bail bond, it

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30470 of 2024(2) dt.17-05-2024 2/2 was not accepted as two criminal cases were detected against him.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner obtained the bail concealing his two criminal antecedents.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, if so advised, he may renew his prayer for bail after six months. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T