← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26632/2019partly allowed disposal

Ana Yadav @ Gena Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-28Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26632 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2018 Thana- BHANGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

ANA YADAV @ GENA YADAV Son of Late Banarsi Yadav, Resident of Village- Ruphiya Toli 2.

Suresh Yadav Son of Ramadhar Yadav Resident of Village-Kherwa, P.S.- Bhitaha, District-West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shankar Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20/22/23/24 and 28 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that there is recovery of 15.500gm Ganja from the possession of the petitioners. Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 24.09.2018. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner no. 1, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26632 of 2019(4) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Bhangaha Police Station Case No. 69 of 2018.

However, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 on bail. Petitioner has no clean antecedent. Accordingly, bail application of petitioner no. 2 is rejected in connection with the aforesaid case.

Learned court below is directed to conclude the trial within one year from the date of receipt/production of the copy of the order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T