Hans Nath Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2052 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2017 Thana -SC ST District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Hans Nath Yadav son of Ramdeo Yadav,

2. Lalchand Yadav son of Ram Bachan Yadav,

3. Ram Bachan Yadav son of Late Nathuri Yadav,

4. Gayatri Devi wife of Sri Hans Nath Yadav,

5. Priyanka Kumari daughter of Sri Hans Nath Yadav,

6. Priti Kumari daughter of Sri Hans Nath Yadav, All resident of VillageNawalpur, P.S. Hussainpur, District Siwan. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Naresh Prasad For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 This appeal is for grant of bail in connection with Siwan SC/ST P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017 registered for the offences under sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 379, 307 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 (i) (x) of the SC/ST Act.

Allegation against the appellants is that they have assaulted the informant and others and also snatched a chain worth Rs. 30,000/- from his wife. Further allegation is that on 20.02.2017, they threatened the informant and abused him by taking his caste name.

Submission of the learned counsel for the appellants

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2052 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 there is delay in lodging the case and furthermore though it is alleged that they have been assaulted, but no injury has been found to show that it has been received by the informant and others. It has further been submitted that appellant nos. 4 to 6 are lady and there is no specific allegation against them. Heard learned Special Public Prosecutor also Having heard both sides and in view of the allegation of abusing by taking the caste name of the informant, I am not inclined to grant bail to the appellants.

Let the appellants surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the Special Court on the basis of the submission as made above and especially that appellant nos. 4 to 6 are lady and appellant nos. 4 to 5 are students and considering this aspect of the matter, the Special Court will dispose of the prayer for bail of the appellants, if possible on the same day, with being prejudiced by the order of this Court. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Mahesh/- U T