Ajeet Yadav @ Ajit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22759 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2014 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ajeet Yadav @ Ajit Yadav, male, aged about 42 years, Son of Photo Yadav @ Lalit Kishore Yadav Resident of Village - Raghunathpur, P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 447, 504, 147, 148, 149, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with S. Kamal P.S. Case No. 294 of 2014.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and even according to the F.I.R. no injury has been caused to anyone. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature. Similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 5129 of 2015. Statement is made at the Bar that the petitioner is on bail in both prior cases in which he is made accused.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22759 of 2019(2) dt.10-04-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Begusarai in connection with S. Kamal P.S. Case No. 294 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T