Ajay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25750 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-403 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== AJAY SINGH S/o Late Kuleshwar Singh Resident of Village- Takula Tand, Police Station Rajouli, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2022 The present matter has been listed under the heading "To Be Mentioned" on the basis of motion slip filed on behalf of the petitioner.

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajouli P.S. Case No. 403 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of 60 litre country made mahua wine from each motorcycle in question. In the way, total 240 litre country made mahua wine

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25750 of 2022(2) dt.23-06-2022 2/3 has been recovered. It is alleged that name of petitioner and others have been surfaced on the verification made by the police.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 15.11.2021 and petitioner bears criminal antecedent of five cases of similar nature in which he has been granted bail in four cases and the police roped the present petitioner merely on suspicion as he was not identified at the place of occurrence or nothing was recovered from possession of the petitioner. In mechanical manner the police usually roped the present petitioner in such type of cases. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering the evidence.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, charge sheet has been submitted and petitioner is not apprehended on the spot and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, after framing of charge, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25750 of 2022(2) dt.23-06-2022 3/3 learned Special Excise Court No. 2, Nawada in connection with Rajouli P.S. Case No. 403 of 2021, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailor shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) shahzad/- U T