M/S Sri Ram Traders v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7085 of 2010 ====================================================== M/S Sri Ram Traders through its Proprietor Shrawan Kumar Saraf S/O Late Mohan Lal Saraf R/O Mohalla- Behind Rani Sati Mandir, Sikandarpur, P.S. Muzaffarpur, Town and Distt.- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The State Election Commission, Patna, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna 3.

District Magistrate-Cum-District Election Officer, Panchayat Muzaffarpur

4. Director, Panchayat Raj, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Maijorwar, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.1,3 & 4 : Mr. Ajay Kumar, AC to SC 17 For the Respondent no.2 : Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER --------------- 12-03-2015 After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh comprehensive representation with all supporting documents before the respondent no.3, the District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer, Muaffarpur raising all the issues which have been raised in the present writ petition.

Permission is accorded.

The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

If such a representation is filed on behalf of the petitioner with a certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today with all supporting documents in support of his claims, then the respondent no.3, the District Magistrate-cum-District Election Officer, Muzaffarpur shall be

Patna High Court CWJC No.7085 of 2010 (3) dt.12-03-2015 2/2 obliged to consider and decide the claims of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order at an early date preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation.

If on consideration of the materials, the respondent no.3 comes to a conclusion that the claims raised on behalf of the petitioner are admissible to him, then consequential order shall also be issued for grant of such admissible claims without any unnecessary further delay.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U