Patna High CourtCWJC/17145/2011withdrawn

Sampurna Nand Dwivedi v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-08-04Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17145 of 2011 ====================================================== Sampurna Nand Dwivedi, Son of Late Vishwamitra Dwivedi, Resident of Village And P.O.- Belhari, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi through the Secretary

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi

3. The Department of Ayush, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi through the Secretary

4. The President, Central Council of Indian Medicine, New Delhi

5. The Deputy Secretary-Cum-Returning Officer, Central Council of Indian Medicine, Health Department, New Secretariat, Patna

6. Sri Basant Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Niteshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Raj Place, Juran Chapra, Road No.-3, District- Muzaffarpur

7. Sri Mantosh Kumar Jha, Son of Sri Indra Mohan Jha Resident of Bateshwar Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.- Rati, District- Madhubani

8. Sri Subhash Chandra Verma, Son of Sri Saryug Prasad Verma, Resident of Village- Brahmpur, P.O. & P.S.- Brahmpur, District- Buxar

9. Sri Prajapati Tripathi, Son of Pandit Gangadhar Sharma Resident of Village- Taukipur, P.O.- Taukipur, District- Siwan .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate For the Union of India : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 04-08-2015 In view of the statutory provision under Rule 28 of the Indian Medicine Central Council (Election) Rules, 1975 laying down procedure for dealing with the elections disputes, which is

Patna High Court CWJC No.17145 of 2011 (2) dt.04-08-2015 2 / 2 apparent from the copy of the rules produced at the time of hearing by the respondent Union of India, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this application to approach the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Sanjay-II/- U