Amit Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50160 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -54 Year- 2016 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ====================================================== Amit Kumar Son of Shiv Kishor Pandit Resident of Village- Owa, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad (wrongly stated as Village- Mahimpur, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya because Mahimpur is resident Village of informant) which is evident from recital of the written report). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rupa Kumari wife of Amit Kumar, D/o Shyam Sundar Pandit Resident of Village- Mahimpur, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 54 of 2016 registered under Sections 498(A) and 494 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of C.J.M., Gaya.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is husband and has falsely been implicated in this case, having no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50160 of 2016 (2) dt.19-12-2016 2/2 case and nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Shail/- U T