← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./1055/2006dismissed

Ram Chandra Mistri And ORS v. State Of Bihar

2016-02-16Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.1055 of 2006 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -0 Year- null Thana -null District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) =========================================================== 1.

Ram Chandra Mistri, son of late Tuntun Mistri 2.

Sanjay Kumar, son of Ramchandra Mistri 3.

Anil Kumar, son of late Sanichal Mistri 4.

Ganesh Kumar @ Ganesh Mistri, son of Ramchandra Mistri 5.

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Mistri, son of Sachindra Mistri All are r/o village of Nagarnausa, Petiyawar, P.S. Nagarnausa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Kumar Goswami, Adv. For the State : Mr. A.P.P. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks revision of the Judgment of conviction dated 2.9.2006 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions judge, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2006 by which he has affirmed the order dated 14.2.2006 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sri Lalbahadur, Hilsa with certain modifications. Having gone through the impugned Judgment, I do not find any perversity and, hence, the revision application stands dismissed.

However, considering the date of occurrence, the sentence is modified to the extent that Petitioners are sentenced to the period already undergone by them.

(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T