Awdhesh Singh @ Awadhash Singh @ Bhaso Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31295 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2022 Thana- KASHICHAK District- Nawada ====================================================== Awdhesh Singh @ Awadhash Singh @ Bhaso Singh Son of Late Bhagirath Singh, Resident of Village - Daulachak, P.S. - Kashichak, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025 Heard Mr. Y.C. Verma, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

Petitioner seeks regular bail who is in custody since 17.05.2022, in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 103 of 2022, FIR dated 28.04.2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Earlier the petitioner has moved before this Hon'ble Court in Cr. Misc. No. 59443 of 2022, which was dismissed vide order dated 28.04.2023. Thereafter, the petitioner again moved before this Hon'ble Court in Cr. Misc. No. 3624 of 2024, which was dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned trial Court.

4.

According to the prosecution case, due to admitted land dispute the co-accused persons fired indiscriminately and also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31295 of 2024(8) dt.10-01-2025 2/2 assaulted informant's family members due to which a person died. 5.

Vide order dated 26.11.2024, a report was called for with regard to the stage of the trial and report dated 06.01.2025 of the learned trial Court reveals that out of ten chargesheeted witnesses, nine witnesses have already been examined and only one witness remains to be examined in the present case. 6.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the other hand has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries five criminal antecedents other than the present.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the nature of allegation levelled in the FIR as well as the report of the learned trial Court, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 103 of 2022, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada.

8.

Prayer is refused.

9.

However, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Shahnawaz/- U T