Md. Muzzafar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38156 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2016 Thana -KRITYANAND NAGAR District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Md. Muzzafar S/o Sah Mohammad

2. Md. Hakim @ Hakim S/o Mansur Both Resident of Village- Kuti Hasali, P.S.- K. Nagar, (Sri Nagar),District- Purnea.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandrasen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-09-2016 Heard Sri Ajit Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Chandrasen Prasad Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

Two petitioners, who are named as accused in K.Nagar (Sri Nagar) P.S. Case No.16/2016 registered for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation made in the F.I.R. appears to be not probable. He submits that from the F.I.R. itself, it is evident that at 12.30 A.M., some one allegedly had informed the informant that they had seen the petitioner and others fleeing away with buffalo

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38156 of 2016 (2) dt.14-09-2016 2/2 of the informant. He submits that it is not probable. However, after noticing the F.I.R, the Court is satisfied that it is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U T