Md. Abdullah Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34922 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-486 Year-2020 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== MD. ABDULLAH ANSARI S/o Md. Kalimullah R/o village- Bela Tedha, P.S.- Kishanpur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajeev Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 384, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 177 and 182(a) of M.V. Act.

The prosecution case in short is that the accused persons used the vehicle of the petitioner in threatening the local residents by affixing a board of All India Crime Prevention Society. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34922 of 2021(2) dt.20-05-2022 2/2 named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case as being owner of the vehicle in question. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. The petitioner had no knowledge that his vehicle is being used by the co-accused persons for the purpose of threatening. The allegation of extortion of money by the co-accused is denied by the petitioner. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 486 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T