Vijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23553 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2018 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.
Vijay Singh, aged about 60 years, Male, Son of Janki Singh, Resident of Village- Jamhara, Police Station- Chakai, District- Jamui. 2.
Putan Singh @ Puttan Singh, aged about 22 years, Male, Son of Kishun Singh, Resident of Village- Jamhara, Police Station- Chakai, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Manish Kumar No2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 145 of 2018 registered under Sections 341, 323, 325, 452, 427, 504, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on Section 302 IPC was added.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute.
There is no specific allegation against the petitioners. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23553 of 2019(3) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-I, Jamui in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 145 of 2018, subject to the following conditions :
(1) On of the bailors would be close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable properties, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.
(2) The petitioner will appear before the learned Court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.
(3) If the petitioner indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T