← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14429/2010dismissed

Dinesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-22Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14429 of 2010 ====================================================== Dinesh Prasad S/O Late Punit Prasad R/O Vill Itasang, P.S. Rahui, DisttNalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary , Department Of Industries Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

2. Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, P.S.Gandhi Maidan, Town & Distt-Patna

3. Managing Director , Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, P.S.Gandhi Maidan, Town & Distt-Patna

4. Secretary, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, P.S.Gandhi Maidan, Town & Distt-Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-02-2018 None appear for the parties.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:- "That by this writ application the petitioner prays for different post-retirement benefits including pension, ACP, as well as the arrears of salary which have not been paid to the petitioner without any valid reason and the same has been withheld by the respondents."

3. In terms of the averments made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna, the petitioner has been paid his dues in

Patna High Court CWJC No.14429 of 2010 dt.22-02-2018 2/2 accordance with law to the extent admissible and for the rest of the claim, the stand is that the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna, does not have any provision for payment of the same to its employees including the petitioner.

4. In the aforesaid background and taking note of the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Ajay Gupta/- AFR/NAFR U