Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27781 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-678 Year-2022 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== RAUSHAN KUMAR Son of Late Uday Rai Resident of village - Sabalpur Nawal Tola, P.S.- Sonpur, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-07-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 13.10.2022 in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 678 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 06.09.2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of IPC.

3. The FIR of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has been transpired during

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27781 of 2023(3) dt.21-07-2023 2/3 investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of coaccused person, namely, Santosh Kumar and thereafter selfconfessional statement of the petitioner was also recorded in which he has accepted his guilt in the present occurrence and except the aforesaid, no other material has come during investigation against the petitioner to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence and nothing has been recovered from conscious possession or the house of the petitioner and till date no TIP has been conducted by the prosecution and the police, after investigation, submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2022.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries three more cases other than the present one.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate1st Class, Saran in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 678 of 2022,with the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27781 of 2023(3) dt.21-07-2023 3/3 (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T