Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35918/2017bail granted

Ramu Das And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-05Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35918 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -114 Year- 2017 Thana -KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- KATIHAR ======================================================

1. Ramu Das, Son of Late Masudan Das,

2. Manju Devi @ Manjula Devi W/o Ramu Das, Both R/o VillageBhawara Pul, Naya Tola, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 05-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Katihar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 114 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the husband is in custody. The petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Katihar (Muffasil) P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35918 of 2017 (3) dt.05-09-2017 No. 114 of 2017 to the satisfaction of Sri D. Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Katihar subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T