Kishor Kumar Yadav@Kishor Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34134 of 2017 (2) dt.20-07-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34134 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ====================================================== KISHOR KUMAR YADAV@KISHOR PRASAD YADAV .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in K. Hat P.S. Case No. 33 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-307, 379 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that one Feroz was apprehended with the stolen cycle and he disclosed the name of the petitioner in his confessional statement. Similar fact has been mentioned in the impugned order by learned Sessions Judge.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed it is ordered that the petitioner named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34134 of 2017 (2) dt.20-07-2017 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No. 33 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T