Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13446 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -166 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYA KOTWALI District- GAYA ====================================================== Rahul Kumar, Son of Sanjay Kumar @ Gandhi, Resident of Village- Bangla Asthan, Maharani Road, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 166 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 504, 307 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of firing but the same did not hit anybody.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is case and counter case between the parties and FIR itself shows that firing did not hit anybody and one of the co-accused having similar allegation has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.10.2017 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 47471 of 2017

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13446 of 2018 (2) dt.06-04-2018 2/2 (Annexure-4).

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 166 of 2017, G.R. No. 2282 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U