Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28253 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2017 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== RANJEET YADAV @ RANJEET KUMAR Son of Budhdeo Yadav Resident of Village - Mahadev Bigha, P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kunwar Narayan Jamuar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mustaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner hereby undertakes to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 23.11.2017 has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 51 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, having earlier been rejected twice by this Court by order dated 27.04.2018 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 20926 of 2018 and order dated 31.10.2018 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 57102 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely because he happens to be the husband of the deceased. As a matter of fact the informant himself in his deposition recorded in course of trial has stated, inter alia, that his daughter came under a running train while returning home. It is stated that the trial is going on and some of the prosecution

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28253 of 2020(4) dt.03-02-2021 2/2 witnesses remain to be examined.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5.Having heard the parties, this Court is not inclined to take a different view of the matter. The petition stands dismissed with the observation that the learned trial Court shall conclude the trial expeditiously and in any event preferably within a period of four months hereof.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

Chandran/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T