Patna High CourtCWJC/17522/2013dismissed

Shiv Shankar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-05-18Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17522 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Shiv Shankar Singh Son Of Late Ramjee Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua )

2. Dwarika Singh Son Of Late Jagarnath Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua )

3. Chhangur Singh Son Of Late Jagarnath Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua )

4. Kashi Singh Son Of Late Vishwanath Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua )

5. Banarsi Singh Son Of Late Vishwanath Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua )

6. Ramnnath Singh Son Of Late Kishunath Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua )

7. Laxman Singh Son Of Late Kishunath Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua )

8. Mathura Singh Son Of Late Kishunath Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua )

9. Badri Singh Son Of Late Kishunath Singh Resident Of Village - Hurara, Police Station Belaon, District - Kaimur ( Bhabhua ) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Collector, Kaimur at Bhabhua

3. Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Bhabhua, District - Kaimur

4. Anchal Adhikari, Rampur, District - Kaimur

5. Officer In charge, Belaon, Distt. Kaimur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prasoon Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 18-05-2016 Heard both sides.

Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, the counsel for the petitioner states that the application has become infructuous as the petitioner has already filed a title suit in respect of the subject land which is pending consideration. He submits that the petitioner shall seek appropriate relief in the said proceeding itself.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17522 of 2013 (2) dt.18-05-2016 2/2 In view of aforesaid, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Needless to observe that the order present shall not inure to the disadvantage of the petitioner in the pending suit. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U