Pintu Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13649 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2017 Thana -PARWALPUR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Pintu Prasad, Son of Nagina Prasad, Resident of Village- Tara Bigha, Police Station- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kaushal Kishor For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pawalpur P.S.Case no.131 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by rod on head.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is case and counter case and the injuries are simple in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13649 of 2018 (2) dt.10-04-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa District Nalanda in connection with Parwalpur P.S.Case No.131 of 2017 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T