Ravi Kaushal And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18074 of 2018 (2) dt.10-04-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18074 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -361 Year- 2016 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Ravi Kaushal son of Raja Ram Yadav

2. Raja Ram Prasad Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadav son of late Ram Krit Yadav, Both resident of village-English Par, P.S.- Tekari(Mau), DistrictGaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramashish For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2018 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Tekari P.S. Case No.361 of 2016 registered under Section 307 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant himself alleged that there was some dispute with regard to electric and road between two sides on account of which the accused persons assaulted the informant and others.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1, Ravi Kaushal and petitioner no.2, Raja Ram Yadav are the son and father. Ravi Kaushal is alleged to have caught Mithilesh Yadav and Raja Ram Yadav is alleged to have assaulted Lakhiya Devi along with Ramashish with lathi and stick.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18074 of 2018 (2) dt.10-04-2018 Lakhiya Devi got injury which is simple in nature. No specific allegation is made against Ravi Kaushal. There is a counter version being Tekari P.S. Case No.362 of 2016. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No.361 of 2016, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U T