Santu Prasad Sah @ Satu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25857 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-363 Year-2011 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Santu Prasad Sah @ Satu Sah Son Of Late Baldeo Sah R/O VillageChampapur Tola Balua, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran. 2.

Ramjee Bharti Son Of Late Ramcharintar Bharti R/O Village- Champapur Tola Balua, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Ranjana Devi Wife Of Akhilesh Chandra Prasad R/O Village- Champapur Tola Balua, P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint (Protest) Case No.363/2011, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner no.1 has got no criminal antecedent whereas petitioner no.2 has got four criminal antecedents as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that after investigation, the police submitted final

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25857 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 2/2 form, but the complainant filed protest petition and the said protest petition was also dismissed by the learned court below. Later on, the complainant filed revision petition by which the order of the learned court below was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration and on that basis cognizance has been taken against the petitioners. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Raxaul at Motihari, District East Champaran in connection with Complaint (Protest) Case No.363 of 2011, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T