Patna High CourtCWJC/6002/2014dismissed

Kanhaiya Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-30Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.6002 of 2014 dt.30-03-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6002 of 2014 =========================================================== Kanhaiya Singh Son Of Ram Bachan Singh Resident Of Village - Lohain Tola, P.O. - Ayar, P.S. - Agion Bazar, District - Bhojpur (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Food & Civil Supply Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Collector, Bhojpur, District - Bhojpur (Bihar)

3. The District Supply Officer, Bhojpur at Ara

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur (Bihar)

5. The Block Supply Officer, Behia, District - Bhojpur (Bihar) .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, GA8 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 06.12.2013 passed by the Collector, Bhojpur at Ara in Rev. Appeal No. 22 of 2012-13.

3. At the very outset, this Court takes note that remedy by way of revision before the Divisional Commissioner is available to the petitioner against the impugned order dated 06.12.2013 passed in Rev. Appeal No. 22 of 2012-2013, which has not been availed of by the petitioner.

4. In view of availability of the alternative remedy as

Patna High Court CWJC No.6002 of 2014 dt.30-03-2018 above, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a revision petition before the Divisional Commissioner for redressal of his grievances.

5. It is made clear that in case such a revision is filed, the concerned authority would have regard to the present proceeding being pursued by the petitioner, while considering any issue relating to condonation of delay, if applicable.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 02.04.2018 Transmission Date N.A.