← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./342/2022withdrawn

Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-09Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.342 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2015 Thana- SC/ST District- Saran ====================================================== Urmila Devi W/o Bhola Majhi Resident of Village - Meera Mushahari, P.s.- Chapra Muffasil, Distt.- Saran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Liyakat Ali Ansari Son of Amin Uddin Resident of Village - Hakama, P.s.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran.

3.

Asagar Ali Son of Liyakat Ali Ansari Resident of Village - Hakama, P.s.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran.

4.

Ahamad Ali Son of Liyakat Ali Ansari Resident of Village - Hakama, P.s.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran.

5.

Mahammad Ali Son of Liyakat Ali Ansari Resident of Village - Hakama, P.s.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran.

6.

Apsana Khatoon D/o Liyakat Ali Ansari Resident of Village - Hakama, P.s.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran.

7.

Shatrughana Mahto Son of Baldev Mahto Resident of Village - Hakama, P.s.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Anant Kumar Bhaskar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-01-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner is seeking permission to withdraw the present petition because trial has already concluded and the petitioner has been convicted.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T