Sri Niwas Ram And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47367 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1611 Year- 2015 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Sri Niwas Ram son of Baijnath Ram
2. Tapeshwar Ram son of Sri Niwas Ram, Both residents of VillageNarwar, P.S. Dinara, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar
2. Pramila Kumari daughter of late Gyanchand Ram wife of Deepak Ram, resident of Village- Baradih, P.S. Sasaram (Agrer), District- Rohtas at Sasaram. At present resident of Village- Thorsan, Post Office- Torni (Lehda), P.S. Kargahar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned A.P.P. for the State as also the learned counsel for the complainant.
In this application for anticipatory bail the petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1611 of 2015 for the offences punishable under sections 467 and 468/34 of the I.P.C.
Allegedly, the petitioners taking advantage of their position fraudulently got the land of the complainant sold in favour of co-accused Lakshman Ram.
Submission is of false implication and that the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47367 of 2016 (3) dt.17-02-2017 2/2 petitioners have got no concern with the execution of the sale deed, they are not the witnesses nor the identifier, they have been made accused as they have helped the complainant in arranging her marriage, in this case Laxman Ram and Sakhichand Ram have already been allowed pre-arrest bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 53909 of 2016 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the petitioners is on the better footing.
The learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant opposes prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners by submitting that the petitioners got executed the sale deed after keeping the complainant in dark. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of. A.C.J.M- IX, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with above mentioned case, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T