Brahmdeo Rishideo v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25922 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2018 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
Brahmdeo Rishideo S/O Late Agannu Rishideo Resident of Village- Pararia, Ward No. 04, Police Station - Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P), DistrictMadhepura. 2.
Nunulal Rishideo Son of Late Agannu Rishideo Resident of Village- Pararia, Ward No. 04, Police Station - Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P), DistrictMadhepura. 3.
Anil Rishideo Son of Late Shiv Narayan Rishideo Resident of VillagePararia, Ward No. 04, Police Station - Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P), DistrictMadhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.) P.S. Case No. 191 of 2018, instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners are alleged to have brutally assaulted the brother of informant who died on the next day.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioners are agnates of informant. No injury was found on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25922 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 the body of the deceased. In the post-mortem report cause of death is shown as could not ascertain. After completion of investigation, police submitted final form stating as Mistake of fact, however, differing with the police report, Court concerned has taken cognizance against the petitioners. There is delay of two days in lodging the F.I.R. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Petitioners undertake to co-operate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and clean antecedent of the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.) P.S. Case No. 191 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T