Murali Manohar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24898 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2019 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Murali Manohar Mandal, Son of Asharfi Mandal Resident of Village - Katahi Ward No. 7, P.S.- Chhatapur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-05-2019 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.49 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469, 471 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution story is that petitioner engaged in forgery work and thereafter with the leadership of Sub Divisional Officer, Triveniganj and Police force constituted a team and conducted the raid at the house of the petitioner and several documents of the Circle Officer, Chhatapur, Sub Divisional Office and Consolidation Officer, Chhatapur were recovered from the house of the petitioner.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 24.02.2019 and the charge sheet has already been submitted as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24898 of 2019(3) dt.22-05-2019 2/2 such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Supaul, in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.49 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T