Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33384 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Siwan ====================================================== Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar Yadav Son of Sri Shivnath Yadav Resident of Village - Faridpur Mathiya, P.S. Hussainganj, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.M.K.Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.

02-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner seeks bail in CIII Case No. 137 of 2021, registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

172 liters & 800 ml. of illicit liquor has been recovered from a car, of which, this petitioner was driver. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and he is in custody since 24.03.2021. Investigation is complete.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33384 of 2021(2) dt.02-09-2021 2/2 Considering the nature of allegation and period of custody, the bail petition of petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd cum Special Judge, Excise, Siwan in connection with CIII Case No. 137 of 2021, on the following conditions: "(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court below and shall remain physically present, as directed by the court below, and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T