Satyam Triyar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38487 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -468 Year- 2014 Thana -SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Satyam Triyar, son of Chiranjivi Triyar, resident of Village- Mohanpur, P.S.- Samastipur Muffasil, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 468 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 326, 307, 504, 34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that this petitioner along with other accused persons took the brother of the informant with him on pretext to compromise the matter of land dispute. Thereafter, the informant followed them on other motorcycle and when he reached Mohanpur bridge temple, he saw this petitioner along with two other accused persons and 4-5 unknown persons variously armed with pistols in their hands. They assaulted the informant and abused his brother. In the meantime, the informant

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38487 of 2017 (3) dt.06-09-2017 2/2 also heard the sound of firing by the accused persons and when he reached near his brother, he saw excessive bleeding from the jaw and right hand of his brother. The brother was lying unconscious on the ground on account of sustaining firearm injury. Case diary has been received.

The injury report is available in the case diary wherein the Doctor has found three injuries. Injury No. 1 was grievous caused by firearm injury whereas injury Nos. 2 and 3 were simple in nature. The bullet was also recovered from the injury. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Petitioner may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T