Ramdeni Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26740 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2020 Thana- BISHWAMBHARPUR DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Ramdeni Sah Son of Late Bhegari Sah Resident of Village - Sukulwa Khurd, P.S. - Gopalganj, District - Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Upendra Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-10-2020 Heard both parties through video conferencing. The petitioner seeks bail in Vishambharpur P.S. Case No. 26 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
35 liters of country-made liquor is alleged to have been recovered from the bicycle of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got clean antecedent, as per statement made in paragraph - 3 of the petition and he is in custody since 01-03-2020. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail application of petitioner is allowed. Let the above-named
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26740 of 2020(2) dt.14-10-2020 2/2 petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Excise, Gopalganj in connection with Vishambharpur P.S. Case No. 26 of 2020 on the following conditions:
"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.".
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay/- U T