Lalan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2847 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -189 Year- 2017 Thana -SALKHUA District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Lalan Yadav, S/o Chandeshwari Yadav, R/o Village- Salkhua Dih, P.S.- Salkhua , Distt.- Saharsa.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 22-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Salkhua P.S. Case No.189 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 Indian Penal Code. In the written report, it is alleged that wife of this petitioner gave dagger to this petitioner and this petitioner gave dagger blow in the left side of chest of the informant. Injury report of the informant has been annexed as Annexure-2, wherein, doctor has found simple injury on the person of the informant.
In the written report, it is mentioned that altercation took place on account of parking of motorcycle. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2847 of 2018 (4) dt.22-02-2018 2/2 the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No.189 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, II, Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T