Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24029 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2020 Thana- NATWAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Munna Kumar Son of Sudama Choudhary Resident of Village-Lauri, P.S.- Surajpura, District-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Upendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shymaeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.

17-09-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner seeks bail in Natwar P.S. Case No. 13 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, two persons committed theft in the house of informant and on chase, one of the coaccused namely Vishal Srivastava was apprehended on the spot and it is alleged that petitioner managed to escape. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR, nor he was arrested on the spot. The name of this petitioner has transpired in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused Vishal Srivastava. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24029 of 2020(2) dt.17-09-2020 2/2 Let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Natwar P.S. Case No. 13 of 2020 on the following conditions:

"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.".

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T