Nikhat Praween v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53140 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Nikhat Praween, W/o Md. Hassan Resident of Mohalla- Islam Nagar, Ward No.27, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 01-02-2016 Heard Mr. Vikramdeo Singh counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP for the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Araria Mahila P.S. Case No. 22 of 2015 registered under sections 498A, 379 and 307/34 IPC.
The petitioner is a lady who is the Gotni of the informant. The allegation is that the petitioner with her husband demanded dowry; although the informant was married several years ago and the wedlock produced two siblings. On one occasion, the husband of the petitioner caught the informant in Aangan and assaulted her.
It is submitted that the petitioner has been named only to put pressure on her husband for certain property of the family.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53140 of 2015 (3) dt.01-02-2016 2/2 There is no allegation of causing injury to the informant attributed to the petitioner. The allegation in this regard has been levelled to the husband of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the parties as also the fact that the allegation of causing injury to the informant is not attributed to the petitioner above named, she, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, shall released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction CJM, Araria in Araria Mahila P.S. Case No. 22 of 2015 on conditions that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be her own/close family member. She shall appear in person on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel her bail bonds. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U