Ramanand Yadav And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50948 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-482 Year-2014 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Ramanand Yadav Son of Late Uttam Lal Yadav 2.

Ghotar Yadav Son of Late Uttam Lal Yadav 3.

Jay Kumar Yadav @ Jay Kishore Yadav Son of Mahrghi Yadav 4.

Asharfi Yadav Son of Late Uttam Lal Yadav 5.

Prithvi Chand Yadav Son of Late Uttam Lal Yadav 6.

Sandeep Yadav Son of Late Mahadeo Yadav 7.

Bechan Yadav Son of Prithvi Chand Yadav 8.

Brahmdeo Yadav Son of Yamun Yadav 9.

Shyama Nand Yadav Son of Yamun Yadav 10.

Arun Kumar Yadav Son of Kuninand Yadav 11.

Krishnadeo Yadav Son of Yamun Yadav 12.

Mahesh Yadav Son of Asharfi Yadav All residents of village - Posdaha, Police Station Narpatganj, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Bidya Nand Ram Son of Late Chhitan Ram resident of village - Posdaha, Police Station Narpatganj, District - Araria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nagendra Pd. Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Shankar Das, Spl.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 20-03-2023 Heard the parties.

The present petition has been preferred for quashing of the order dated 13.05.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Araria in Narpatganj P.S. Case No.482 of 2014 whereby and whereunder took cognizance under Sections

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50948 of 2015(2) dt.20-03-2023 2/2 341, 323, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that subsequently the informant made a turn around and put different facts on affidavit which is Annexure-2 and as such the petitioner may be allowed to raise all the points before the Trial court at an appropriate stage.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T