← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1044/2023disposed

Asgari Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-10Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1044 of 2023 In CRIMINAL REVISION No.886 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Asgari Khatoon Wife of Md. Irshad @ Bholtu, Daughter of Late Siraj, Resident of Village- Maula Nagar, Bhagwatchak, P.S.- Surajgarha, DistrictLakhisarai. 2.

Saliha Praveen Minor Daughter of Md. Irshad @ Bholtu, Under Natural Guardianship of her mother namely Asgari Khatoon, Resident of VillageMaula Nagar, Bhagwatchak, P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai. 3.

Aaliya Parveen Minor Daughter of Md. Irshad @ Bholtu, Under Natural Guardianship of her mother namely Asgari Khatoon, Resident of VillageMaula Nagar, Bhagwatchak, P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 2.

Md. Irshad @ Bholtu Son of Md. Nisar Ahmad, Resident of Village- Maula Nagar, Bhagwatchak, P.S. Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Alok (SC-7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for initiation of a proceeding of contempt against the contemnors-Opposite Parties, specially Opposite Party No.2 Md. Irshad @ Bholtu, who willfully, deliberately and intentionally disobeying the order dated 15.04.2019 passed in Cr.Rev. No. 883 of 2017 passed by Hon'ble Mr.

Patna High Court MJC No.1044 of 2023(3) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha remitted back the matter to the learned court of Family Judge to dispose of maintenance case within a period of nine month from the receipt of the order. In the meantime, the petitioner (husband) has to pay Rs. 3000/- to Opposite Party No.1(wife) and Rs. 1000/- each to Opposite Party Nos. 2 & 3(daughters) till final decision of the maintenance case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the couple is residing together and leading a happy life, in that background, granting liberty to agitate the matter, if situation so warrants, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

4. Permission accorded.

5. Accordingly, MJC No. 1044 of 2023 stands disposed of as withdrawn.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U