Chandra Bhushan Singh v. State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.588 of 2010 (6) dt.11-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.588 of 2010 ====================================================== Chandra Bhushan Singh, Son of Shri Sheoji Singh, resident of VillageRamdash Chak Khat Tola, Police Station- Dighwara, District- Saran (Chapra).
.... .... Petitioner.
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary (Home) Police Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram.
3. The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram.
4. Lali Chauhan @ Ayodhya Chauhan, Son of not known, permanent resident of Village- Takiya Sasaram, P.S. Sasaram Town, DistrictRohtas, at present resident of Fatehpur, P.O. Sitarampur, Police StationAsansol South, District- Vardhman (West Bengal). .... .... Respondents.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sachida Nand Rai, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. (GA 4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
This application has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs directing the respondent no. 2 to lodge F.I.R. with regard to kidnapping of Basukinath Singh son of Tribhuwan Singh. Learned counsel for the State however filed a supplementary counter affidavit stating therein that F.I.R. has been lodged. However, he has not produced any copy of F.I.R. but endorsement on the written report of Chandra Bhushan Singh, dated 19.07. 2010 for lodging the Sasaram Town P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.588 of 2010 (6) dt.11-05-2015 481 of 2015. It is submitted that the F.I.R. registered bearing Sasaram P.S. Case No. 481 of 2015. It is further submitted that investigation is going on.
Learned counsel for the State however prayed for two months time for submission of substantial progress of the case. Having regard to the fact, F.I.R. has been lodged and assurance given by the State, the petition is disposed off with direction to the I.O. concern to expedite the investigation, so that investigation is to be completed within six months. With this observation, this petition is disposed off. m.p.
(Gopal Prasad, J) U T