Patna High CourtCR. MISC./909/2017dismissed

Suryabansh Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-01-16Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.909 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2015 Thana -AWTARNAGAR DistrictSARAN =====================================

1. Suryabansh Singh, Son of Late Magru Singh, Resident of Village- Phakuli, Police Station- Awatar Nagar, DistrictSaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ravish Kumar Singh, Son of Chandra Shekhar Singh, R/o Vill. Phakuli, P.S.-Awatar Nagar, District-Saran. .... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2017 Heard the parties.

The present application, under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to opposite party No. 2, who is on bail in connection with Awatar Nagar P.S. Case No. 51 of 2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.909 of 2017 (2) dt.16-01-2017 2/2 petitioner that the petitioner, who is the informant of the said case, has received an anonymous letter containing threats of dire consequences if he did not get the matter compromised. It has also been stated that opposite party No. 2 is threatening the petitioner otherwise also for getting the case compromised.

On the basis of the materials, which have been brought on the record, I do not think it to be a fit case for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party No. 2. However, if the petitioner approaches the Superintendent of Police, Saran, for any protection in this regard, the Superintendent of Police shall look into it and take necessary steps to ensure that the petitioner is not unnecessarily harmed.

This application has no merit and is, accordingly, rejected, but with the direction as above.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Praveen-II/- U T