← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53814/2017allowed

Md. Wasim v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53814 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2017 Thana -KAJI MUHAMMADPUR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Md. Wasim, Son of Md. Saniz, Resident of Mohalla- Chak Abduwahid Manjhouliya Road, P.S.- Kazi Mohammadpur, Dist- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and the counsel appearing for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kazi Mohamadpur P.S. Case No. 131 of 2017 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the instant case, there was a land dispute leading to an altercation between both sides and both sides had sustained injuries and there is a case and counter blast case. Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the nature of injury does not support the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner. He submits that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53814 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 2/2 Sessions court, the case of the petitioner deserves similar treatment in view of the fact that there is a land dispute and there is a case and counter case between the parties. He submits that from perusal of the fardbeyan, it would be evident that there is no repeated blow and as such, the injury does not suggest that the offence is made out under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the fact that there is a land dispute and there is a case and counter case between the parties and the statement made in paragraph-3 of the petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within one month from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-I, cum ACJM, Muzaffarpur in Kazi Mohamadpur P.S. Case No. 131 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BTiwary/- U T