Dr. Navin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8158 of 2019 ====================================================== Dr. Navin Kumar Son of late Shivchandra Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageSihma, P.O. Sihma, P.S. Matihani, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary of Human Resources Development Department, Bihar at Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

3.

The Senior Deputy Collector-Cum-in Charge Officer, Matihani Block, Begusarai.

4.

The District Education Officer, Begusarai.

5.

The Block Education Officer, Matihani, Begusarai. 6.

The Zonal Manager of Allahabad Bank, Patna, District-Patna. 7.

The Branch Manager of Allahabad Bank, Matihani, Village-Matihani, District- Begusarai Branch Code- 00327 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw ( GP23 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 02-11-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "That this is an application on behalf of the petitioner for issuance a writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature certiorari to quash the letter reference No.REC/Mat/1819/92 issued by the Allahabad Bank to the D.D.O. Gyan Bharati High School Begusarai dated 13.3.2019 and for issuance a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondents to not issued

Patna High Court CWJC No.8158 of 2019(3) dt.02-11-2022 2/2 any coercive action against the petitioner while the petitioner is ready to provide the sanctioned loan amount in the installments from the salary of the rest principle amount and/or pass and other order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under circumstances of the case and/or may be pass other and further order which the petitioner is entitled to."

On 01.11.2022, we had passed the following order: "Despite repeated calls, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner. However, in the interest of justice, matter is adjourned.

List this matter on 2nd of November, 2022 in the category of 'Order Matters'."

Even today, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

As such, the present petition stands dismissed for default.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/Sujit U